Bounding force changes inside an IMU packet
Eleven additional mathematical checks pass alongside the seventeen existing quantization/period checks. They bound continuous force magnitude when an explicit continuous motion assumption is supplied. No recording is selected or analyzed by these controls.
An IMU (inertial measurement unit) records an integrated force vector. If that vector turns during a packet, its integrated magnitude can be smaller than the integral of its magnitude. Fine sampling alone does not make them equal.
The direction-cone bound
Write body-frame force as \(f(t)=m(t)u(t)\), with \(m\geq0\) and unit direction \(u\). Suppose a continuous direction can be assigned angular speed no larger than \(\beta\) throughout a packet of duration \(T\). Relative to the midpoint direction, the force lies within a cone of half-angle \(\beta T/2\).
For \(\beta T/2<\pi/2\), projection onto the midpoint direction and the triangle inequality give
The force magnitude may change within the packet; constant magnitude is not required. The bound concerns the body-frame force direction, not merely aircraft angular speed. Changes in the required navigation force also affect it. An omitted gyro or fused attitude cannot silently supply this assumption.
For illustration, an assumed direction rate of 10°/s over 5 ms raises an upper bound near 9.81 m/s² by about 0.00000094 m/s². That is an example motion envelope, not measured sensor performance. Summing body vectors across one second can lose much more information than using individual 5 ms packets.
Period uncertainty and unsupported assumptions
The helper retains the count-error box and lower/upper integration periods. It uses each packet's largest possible period for the cone angle, bounds the integral of magnitude and divides by the allowed total duration. It assumes neither independent random errors nor a 1/√N reduction in deterministic bounds.
Without a direction-rate assumption, or if any packet's cone reaches 90°, the continuous upper bound remains explicitly unavailable. A complete rotation can integrate to zero despite substantial continuous force; the tests retain that counterexample. Unsupported cones are not clipped.
Verification and remaining work
Independent exact integrals cover rotating forces with constant and changing magnitude, uncertain periods, no direction assumption and a full rotation. All existing integer, sign, quantization and duration tests still pass.
This supplies one deterministic component of C03's error budget. It does not establish a recording's direction envelope, integration clock, calibration, synchronization, receiver-derivative uncertainty or statistical coverage. Common motion/support rules and combined uncertainty remain before C04's recorded-data comparison. The main 53-stretch findings are unchanged.
Averaging tests · Increment bounds · Quantization · Roadmap.