Local Level Lab

Airborne measurements. Open methods.

Can training-compatible calibrations predict different later positions?

12/12 numerical checks complete; 12/12 proposed points satisfy nonlinear training.

Processing Feasible points Sampled N spread Sampled E spread Sampled height spread
Zero removal 6/6 21.753 m 13.483 m 1.664 m
Profiled removal 6/6 7.195 m 8.698 m 0.759 m

These are spreads between sampled feasible numerical trajectories and the zero reference, not outer uncertainty bounds. The original width targets are 20 m north, 20 m east and 50 m height. A small sampled spread does not prove those targets achievable over the entire parameter domain.

Processing Ray Actual training maximum Future N / E / height change Feasible
Zero N − 0.616 m -9.025 / -1.798 / 0.128 m Yes
Zero N + 0.795 m 12.728 / 0.745 / -0.793 m Yes
Zero E − 0.841 m -5.248 / -8.657 / 0.864 m Yes
Zero E + 0.574 m 1.665 / 4.826 / -0.036 m Yes
Zero height − 0.695 m -2.041 / 3.895 / -0.143 m Yes
Zero height + 0.701 m -1.026 / -4.458 / 0.870 m Yes
Profiled N − 0.657 m -2.600 / -4.073 / 0.415 m Yes
Profiled N + 0.787 m 4.594 / 1.261 / 0.090 m Yes
Profiled E − 0.751 m -2.524 / -5.818 / 0.535 m Yes
Profiled E + 0.683 m 1.455 / 2.605 / 0.090 m Yes
Profiled height − 0.601 m -0.940 / 2.741 / -0.035 m Yes
Profiled height + 0.856 m -2.355 / -5.957 / 0.725 m Yes

Each point is chosen from earlier saved training quantities, frozen before one new full-model query, and checked against the unchanged ±1-metre training allowance. The quadratic proposal heuristic cannot establish feasibility; only the reported nonlinear check determines that label. Every original direction is retained; no new outcome causes a retry.

These generated zero-reference cases are separate from the active long-record study with perturbed training observations. They do not establish aircraft uncertainty, native execution-error bounds, scientific significance or a change to the 53-stretch findings.

Frozen scope · Original nonlinear probes · Prediction requirements.