Saved prediction with mutually consistent calibration errors

The 24-case component qualification passes. Apply its six necessary inequalities to all 48 sealed 7.2-second generated cases. Preserve the original 27 physical coordinates, 24 shared-error coordinates, eight sectors, measurements, error allowances and saved nonlinear/native results. No native calculation is rerun.

Freeze the completed component evidence, generated inputs, result bundles, environment, implementation and 48 identities. Recontract each saved domain using at most eight outward row passes. A contradiction is an exclusion only when supported by those necessary inequalities; it must not remove the known in-sector calibration. Compute six future support proposals per included identity. Retain the old valid certificates as fallbacks, extended by zeros for the extra rows. Prediction ranges must not enlarge.

Preserve the unchanged engineering target: complete widths at most half the projected common-acceleration baseline on every axis in all six groups. Also report changes from the immediate common-transform predecessor. Correctness and usefulness remain distinct. Do not relax the target after results.

Limits: 48 identities, 288 LP proposals, at most 1,152 exact support evaluations (proposal/fallback checks and independent endpoint audit). Reserve proposals before execution. Zero native calls, packet visits, native bounds, original aircraft reads, observed fits or protected ESA outcomes. Four workers use one thread each; allow 300 cooperative seconds, with no retries or extensions.

Save revised training and future envelopes before accessing the known physical calibration, its common-error coordinates or future outcomes. Require every in-sector truth to remain feasible and contained. Independently reconcile all emitted future certificates and endpoints. Publish every task and each complete sector union, including exclusions and failures. The single saved-case local smoke test precedes freezing and permits six support proposals, with no native integration. It is not another aircraft experiment.

These checks assess a mathematical construction on generated data. Whole-program floating-point enclosure, recording-scale usefulness and actual observation-error adequacy remain open gates before new aircraft prediction fits.