Complete prediction with training-conditioned acceleration

The separately frozen six-case native qualification passed. Local analytic tests verify preserved coefficient blocks, componentwise allowance selection, exact future endpoints and all work counters. Keep completed evidence unchanged.

Use all 48 saved column-orientation sectors: eight sectors for each of six candidate/processing groups, 1,600 generated packets per input and a 7.2-second future horizon. Preserve all original physical limits, training constraints, contracted boxes and 51 coordinates. No new selection or calibration fit.

For each sector:

1. Project the full affine acceleration expression onto its training region: six LP proposals, eighteen exact support checks including fallbacks.
2. Independently verify that certificate before native use: six exact supports.
3. Reconstruct the original source/reference and compute one conditioned native enclosure. Require unchanged native center and all shared coefficients.
4. Retain the smaller independently valid old/new component remainder, preserving its position/lever decomposition and all remaining allowances. Recompute the future affine support: six LP proposals and eighteen exact support checks, including comparison with the previous certificates.
5. Save the prediction before checking known truth. Independently verify its six exact signed future supports and outward endpoints. No extra source audit.

Reserve work before execution. The total ceiling is 48 identities, 48 enclosure calls / 153,600 bound-step reservations, 576 LP proposals, 2,304 exact support evaluations, zero native prediction calls, original reads or observed fits. Each LP has a one-second cooperative allowance. Each enclosure has a 120-second cooperative allowance; the whole study has 1,800 seconds. Four workers use one numerical thread each. Failed or interrupted identities stay charged. No retries or expanded allowance. Save source/input/environment hashes and failures.

Keep every sector in its group's union. All eight must pass correctness; a failed or unsupported sector blocks its group. Success still requires complete widths at most half the original projected 7.2-second baseline on every axis in every group. Also report changes from the immediate predecessor. Component improvement alone cannot pass this gate. Future truth does not construct bounds.

These generated controls cannot establish aircraft-error coverage. Even a successful engineering comparison does not authorize observed fits without the remaining numerical, physical-adequacy and error-model requirements. Publication copies sealed results without rerunning calculations.